If you've ever wandered through a city, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on street light poles. They look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
They are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create issues for users.
The Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. what is a safe distance from a cell tower 's usually 1.6 watts per kilogram, spread over a Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This can result in a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated development of skin diseases like dermatitis, cancer of the skin and cataracts.
Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and never to exceed 30 minutes, for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
In the event that you've used mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest location from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further you are from it.
While this sounds like a good idea but the truth is that people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered significant more health issues than those who lived farther away from the antennas.
But, the study found that people who moved into areas farther away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems.
This is because radiofrequency radiation, used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, the skin. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. It is also the most important organ in the human body, and is responsible for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal absorption into body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat caused by RF pulses. Helpful resources are not compatible with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.
Additionally, the ICNIRP and FCC limit the maximum limits of exposure to peak local SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) that is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Additionally, psSAR hasn't been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic impacts. This would result in an increased risk of negative health consequences. For example, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin disorders, such as acne.